Case Note 297084 [2019] NZPrivCmr 11: Parents complain school mishandled their child’s sensitive medical data
Two parents complained to our Office after a primary school displayed their child’s Medical Action Plan (MAP) in the school staffroom.
Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
We respect your Do Not Track preference.
You can search for case notes either by using the date filter below, or by using the free text search on our website. The free text search box displays in the top right hand corner of your desktop window. For mobile devices, you can access the free text search box from the menu icon (the three horizontal lines) on the top right corner of your device screen.
Displaying 30 - 49 of 369
Two parents complained to our Office after a primary school displayed their child’s Medical Action Plan (MAP) in the school staffroom.
A woman who was unhappy in her job made an enquiry to an employment agency about changing jobs, but the agency breached her privacy by disclosing her enquiry.
A couple complained to our office after they found out that a medical centre receptionist had disclosed sensitive medical information about them.
A man complained to our office after a temporary employment agency conducted a credit check on him for a role which involved no financial risk.
A man made an access request to a government agency for the video footage taken by a staff member of him protesting outside one of their offices.
A woman taking a personal grievance against a former employer asked for information about herself.
A pawn shop contacted a woman’s employer about an unresolved debt and disclosed information about the debt.
A man made a request to a law firm for access to his information. The law firm demanded the long-time client pay $19,000 to be sent his information.
A man complained that his criminal record had been accessed improperly.
A social service agency that caused unnecessary delays in resolving a complaint left a woman feeling vulnerable and unimportant.
A phone provider refused to give a man records of his texts and calls because he'd received them rather than sent them.
The Sensible Sentencing Trust incorrectly identified a man as a convicted paedophile on its website for almost two years.
An NZ Post delivery agent complained to us about audio recordings made by cameras installed on “Paxster” electric delivery vehicles.
A woman was surprised when a home improvement company cold-called her mobile phone. She rejected the sales offer and asked the caller to remove her details.
A passenger contacted an airline, requesting all the information they had about him relating to a ticket dispute.
A woman was dismissed by her employer after drugs and drug-taking tools were seen in her car while it was parked in the company carpark.
A woman wanted an insurance company to delete all the personal information it had about her.
A man complained that his new Automobile Association (AA) card was configured so that it would share his personal information with a supermarket chain.
An academic who was dismissed from his university position requested all of his work emails from a 12 month period of his employment.
A couple with young children complained to us after a childcare centre referred a debt to a collection agency, without checking the accuracy of the information.