Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.

We respect your Do Not Track preference.

An older woman in a yellow blazer sits looking at a report. She is adjusting her glasses. The Privacy Commissioner has conducted an own motion investigation into Veda Advantage’s charge for urgent requests by consumers for access to their own credit information. Read a copy of the Report by the Privacy Commissioner into Veda Advantage’s charge for urgent requests for personal information (opens to PDF, 338KB).

The investigation has concluded that Veda’s current charge of $51.95 for urgent requests is unreasonable. Veda is not legally entitled to charge for some of the aspects of the process that make up its charges. The only aspect that can be charged for is the actual cost of making the information available to the individual – that is copying or formatting; and for delivering the information to the consumer.

The Commissioner’s view is that a reasonable charge would be nominal and that a flat rate at such a high level is unreasonable and therefore unlawful.

The Commissioner has sought undertakings from Veda:

  • that Veda will only charge for the actual cost of putting the requested information into a format ready for delivery and the actual cost of the delivery of information to
    the requester
  • that Veda will cease charging for other aspects of processing urgent requests.

At the date of publishing this report, Veda had not provided the Commissioner with the assurances sought. Veda disagrees with our interpretation of what the law permits.

The Commissioner is now considering what further action to take. That action could take the form of either amending the Credit Reporting Privacy Code, or referring the case to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings for him to consider whether to file proceedings against Veda in the Human Rights Review Tribunal or both.

The first step is to publish this report and findings in order to inform consumers about their rights. While these matters are resolved, consumers may wish to seek free access to their credit report on a regular basis to reduce the risk that they will be put in a position of having to make an urgent request.

This investigation has only been against Veda Advantage. We have not yet investigated other credit reporters’ practices. The Commissioner is considering whether to do so.