Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
We respect your Do Not Track preference.
Sharing information is a major part of how we work together effectively across government to provide children and young people with the services and supports that they need.On this page:
Download a PDF of the guidance on this page (PDF, 507KB).
Download the Information sharing protocol template (docx, 744KB).
Information sharing is a critically important activity for government – it’s something that happens every day. We cannot simply function in artificial silos created by our organisational structures. Agencies and organisations need to work together to provide appropriate and timely services and supports for children, young people and their families.
That means making sure that relevant information is available to the right people at the right time in the right way.
Of course, if we do not get our privacy thinking right, we can cause real harm. Failing to think things through properly also compromises our ability to achieve the outcomes that we’re aiming for. None of that is acceptable.
That’s why specific legislation (e.g. Privacy Act 2020, Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 and Family Violence Act 2018) provides a variety of ways for agencies to share information about children and young people safely and respectfully.
The purpose of this guidance is to help people working with children and young people understand:
The guidance will help you share information at a multi-agency meeting in a considered way and where the child or young person is at the centre of decision making.
We have also created an information sharing protocol template to help to support agencies and organisation document their sharing activity. This guidance aligns to the structure of that template so you can develop your information sharing protocol in a systematic and consistent manner.
|
While this guidance is focused on sharing information about children and young people, the guidance and template can still be used where you want to share information in a multi-agency meeting about any individual, including adults. |
This guidance can be used by:
To provide services and deliver effective outcomes for children and young people, agencies and organisations often need to share information.
Multi-agency meetings enable attending agencies and organisations to share relevant information with each other to better understand and quantify the extent of a child or young person’s needs and then identify, prioritise and then deliver appropriate and effective supports, interventions, and services.
Example: Police-led multi-agency meeting to reengage youth offenders in education or employmentThere has been a significant increase in residential burglaries committed by youth in a small geographical area. Local police would like to identify, if possible, the cause of the increase in offending, and work with the youth offenders to reengage them with education or employment opportunities. To achieve this, police will need to work closely with local non-government support organisations, and government agencies who also have an interest in seeing children and young people thriving and achieving e.g. the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Social Development and Oranga Tamariki. Regular multi-agencies meetings will enable the attending agencies and organisations to share and receive relevant information with each other. This will enable Police and attending agencies and organisations to identify and then implement effective supports and interventions. |
Example: Education led multi-agency meeting to identify learning support servicesSchool attendance has been dropping over the last few years. The Ministry of Education (the Ministry) wants to understand the drivers behind the reduction in attendance rates and implement effective learner focused interventions to encourage learners to attend school regularly. To achieve this, the Ministry needs to work closely with schools, learning support service delivery partners, other government agencies (e.g. Oranga Tamariki, Police, and non-government support organisations). Regular multi-agency meetings will enable agencies and organisations to share relevant information with the Ministry. The sharing of this information will help the Ministry identify and then implement timely, appropriate and effective supports and interventions. To ensure sharing of information at the attendance focused multi-agency meetings is appropriate and consistent, the Ministry will develop an information sharing protocol that is followed by all multi-agency meeting participants. |
Example: Providing support for victims of family harmIntegrated Safety Response, Whāngaia Ngā Pā Harakeke and Safety Assessment Meetings (SAM tables) are examples of family harm-focused multi-agency meetings. These initiatives bring together government agencies and community organisations and enable them to share relevant information about victims of family harm and identity appropriate supports and interventions. |
Information sharing is a critically important activity for government agencies and organisations that support children and young people. However, sharing information at multi-agency meetings can be challenging when there are no clear policies and procedures to follow.
Everyone knows the consequences of sharing too much can be significant. But so can the consequences of sharing too little. The way to be confident you’re doing the right thing is to embed best practice information sharing into the governance and operation of multi-agency meetings.
Good information sharing practices:
Good information sharing practices will protect the privacy, mana and dignity of the children and young people you’re sharing information about and help you meet the objectives of your multi-agency meeting effectively and efficiently.
|
We expect that all multi-agency meetings, especially those designed to operate over a period of time, have an information sharing protocol in place. |
The purpose of a multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol is to document authorised sharing of information and ensure all attending agency and organisation representatives are aware of the legal authority that permits the sharing, the purpose(s) for which the information is being shared, and what information can be shared.
A multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol records:
The multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol helps attending agency and organisation representatives confidently share relevant information about children and young people in a timely manner. It also helps them to pause and make confident judgement calls when proposed information sharing within the meeting may create privacy risks.
It does this by:
|
An information sharing protocol demonstrates that attending agencies and organisations have taken a privacy by design approach to ensure sharing information about children and young people is privacy protective and mana enhancing. |
How to develop a multi-agency meeting protocol When setting up a multi-agency meeting it is important to think about and set up your information sharing activity correctly.
You can use this guidance to help you complete the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol template – it walks you through each section of the template and highlights the things you need to think about when setting up your information sharing activities.
You can access the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol template here.
A clear purpose is key. Your meeting purpose is the foundation on which the rest of your information sharing activity and documentation is built.
A clear purpose will help:
There must be a legal authority to share information with attending agency and organisation representatives. The multi-agency information sharing protocol should clearly state the legal authority for each purpose for which information is being shared.
The information sharing protocol includes common legal authorities used to share information about children and young people. You can delete the legal authorities that do not apply to the purpose of your multi-agency meeting or manually enter the legal authority if it isn’t one of the examples provided for in the template.
|
The multi-agency meeting protocol does not itself authorise the sharing of information – it cannot create or change the law. All sharing of personal information must be permitted by legislation, such as the Privacy Act, the Oranga Tamariki Act, the Family Violence Act, or an agency’s enabling legislation. |
If you’re using the Oranga Tamariki Act or the Family Violence Act information sharing provisions, you’ll need to ensure that all attending agency and organisation representatives meet the criteria for sharing and using information under those provisions.
Section 66C of the Oranga Tamariki Act (wellbeing and safety of children)
Only the following agencies and individuals can share and use information using section 66C of the Oranga Tamariki Act:
Read more about child welfare and protection agency and independent persons definitions.
Section 20 of the Family Violence Act (family violence)
Only the following agencies or individuals can share and use information using section 20 of the Family Violence Act:
Read more about family violence agency and social services practitioner definitions.
Like your meeting purpose, having a clearly defined purpose for the sharing of information is critical. The purpose of sharing should be aligned with the purpose of the multi-agency meeting.
Being clear about why you need to share a child or young person’s information shows that the sharing is justified and has been carefully considered. It also helps stop ‘scope creep’ – that is, to stop the purpose of the sharing changing over time without proper consideration or authorisation.
Purpose for sharing |
|
|
Attending agencies and organisations may share information for the following purposes |
|
|
Attending agency/organisation |
Purpose for sharing information |
|
Ministry of Education |
|
|
Oranga Tamariki |
|
|
Police |
|
Purpose for sharing |
|
|
Attending agencies and organisations may share information for the following purposes |
|
|
Attending agency/organisation |
Purpose for sharing information |
|
Ministry of Education |
|
|
Oranga Tamariki |
|
|
Corrections |
|
|
Whare Manaaki |
|
Through the development of your purpose statements (both the multi-agency meeting and information sharing purposes) you’ll have determined:
You’ll need to work with the attending agencies and organisations to identify the information they hold that is relevant to the purpose of your meeting. Attending agency and organisation representatives know the information their agency or organisation holds and understand any limitations on that information such as reliability, accuracy, and restrictions on secondary use.
Things to think about:
|
Identifying this information early and recording it in your multi-agency meeting protocol ensures that everyone understands what information can be shared, with whom and for what purpose, and reduces unnecessary delays in achieving the purposes of the meeting. |
Read more guidance about what may be relevant.
Example: Attendance information held by Ministry of EducationAttendance information is made up of many attendance data variables, not all of which may be relevant to the purposes of a multi-agency meeting. The information sharing protocol should be clear on what attendance data variables are relevant to the purpose and will be shared at the multi agency meeting. Instead of recording ‘attendance information’ in the protocol, the protocol could record that the Ministry will share the attendance rate of the individual over the last X months, the number of justified and unjustified absences during the specified period, the reasons attributed to those absences, and any attendance interventions that have been put in place. |
Example: Health information held by Health NZ | Te Whatu OraInstead of recording ‘health information’ in the protocol, the protocol should record the specific health information that Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora will share that is relevant for the purposes of the meeting. For example, where information is being shared to support reducing non-attendance rates, relevant health information could include current mental health diagnoses, disability information, and any health interventions/ supports currently being provided. |
Information to be shared |
||
Attending agencies and organisation may share the following information if it is relevant to achieving the purposes set out above: |
||
Attending agency/organisation |
Information to be shared |
Information Security Classification |
|
Ministry of Education/Attendance Service Provider |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Oranga Tamariki |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Ministry of Social Development |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Health NZ |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Kainga Ora |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Police |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Corrections |
|
In-Confidence |
|
Ministry of Justice |
|
In-Confidence |
|
All attending agencies and organisations |
|
In-Confidence |
Attending agency and organisation representatives shouldn’t put any information shared at a multi-agency meeting into their own business systems or records unless they have been tasked to provide services or supports to the child, young person or their family. In that case, they should only record the information necessary to provide that service or support. That means you should not collect and store information about a person just because you think it might be relevant in the future. ‘Just in case’ is not a good enough reason.
|
You should check with your privacy, legal or information sharing teams if you want to use the information shared at a multi-agency meeting for a secondary purpose. |
If an attending agency or organisation representative needs to keep the information so that they can carry out the purpose of the sharing (e.g. provide relevant services or supports), then they should note:
Tikanga considerations In many cases Māori data and information is a taonga and may require additional controls and restrictions to ensure the mana of the individuals is respected. Where you are proposing to share Māori data and information you should consider whether tikanga should be applied to the sharing and subsequent use of the data. This consideration is especially important when a Māori organisation or an iwi representative may be attending the meeting.
Tikanga is a set of values, principles, understandings, practices, norms and mechanisms from which a person or community can determine the correct action in te ao Māori. Tikanga is not fixed. What tikanga will be appropriate will depend on the circumstances and should be determined through meaningful engagement with the people who may be impacted by the sharing and use of the information.
Each attending agency and organisation will have its own definition of Māori data, Māori Data Governance strategies and Māori engagement practices that will guide considerations and incorporation of tikanga into any information sharing protocol. You should engage your Māori advisory teams early in the development of your information sharing protocol to ensure engagement with Māori and sharing of Māori data is undertaken appropriately and in line with agreed protocols and practices.
You’ll need to agree on the method of sharing information between the attending agency and organisation representatives.
There are several ways information can be shared, including:
In all cases, attending agencies and organisations must ensure that the method of sharing information is one that’s approved for use by their agency or organisation and protects the information about the child or young person.
Where an agency or organisation has been tasked to provide support to a child, a young person or their whanau and require additional information from another agency or organisation they should request that information directly from the relevant agency or organisation. When requesting information about the wellbeing or safety of a child or young person you can use the section 66C request template from Oranga Tamariki.
Where a secure business system is used to share information, there should be a robust access policy setting out:
Terms and conditions of access and use should be clearly documented and understood by all attending agencies and organisations.
|
Where information is shared through a secure business system, we recommend that the business system terms and conditions of access and use is attached to the Protocol as an appendix. A privacy impact assessment should be completed to ensure the secure business system has the necessary privacy controls in place to protect personal information from unauthorised access, use and disclosure. We recommend that the privacy impact assessment is attached to the Protocol as an appendix. Both the terms and conditions of access and use and the privacy impact assessment should be reviewed annually. |
Where information to be shared has been assigned a security classification, attending government agencies must ensure that the appropriate handling requirements under the Protective Security Requirements are met, including how the information is shared.
If non-government organisations are attending the multi-agency meetings, you will need to ensure they’re entitled to receive information with that security classification, and that they understand how to handle it.
Read more information about security classification.
The following are some things to consider when deciding how information will be shared:
Any restrictions or controls that are put in place to ensure the method of sharing is secure should be recorded in your information sharing protocol. The protocol template provides some standard controls that you can use but you can also insert your own specific controls.
Method of sharing |
|
Attending agencies and organisations will share information with other attending agencies and organisations using the following methods: |
|
Before the Meeting |
(Example only) The lead agency will provide the names, DOB and any relevant information to the attending agency and organisation representatives. This information will be contained in a password protected document attached to an email to attending agency and organisation representatives. The email will be marked as ‘In-Confidence – external” and will include a privacy statement. The password is sent via a separate email or alternative contact channel (e.g. text). |
During the Meeting |
(Example only) Information will be shared by attending agencies and organisations verbally. Agencies or organisations that are tasked to undertake actions may record and retain information relevant to undertaking those actions. |
After the Meeting |
(Example only) Where the lead agency requires additional follow up information that information will be requested from the relevant agency under 66C of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989. Such requests for information will be made using the agency to agency sharing document. Information shared between attending agency and organisation representatives outside of these meetings will be done so under the individual agency’s interagency sharing protocols, or by using the agency to agency sharing document. |
This section of the protocol sets out the security controls required to protect personal information shared at a multi-agency meeting. The section contains two parts: security classification and security controls.
Government agencies must ensure that they comply with the New Zealand Government Security Classification Systems and Protective Security Requirements (PSR) when sharing information. The security classification attached to the information will determine whether any additional controls are required to protect the information and comply with the PSR. You’ll need to identify the appropriate security classification and select from the drop-down box in the agreement template.
Read more information about Protective Security Requirements.
Your ICT or information security team should be able to help you identify the correct security classification for the information being shared.
|
As a general rule, all personal information should be classified as IN-CONFIDENCE at a minimum. |
Appropriate security controls are an important part of sharing personal information. A loss or compromise of information before, during and after it is shared can have serious impacts on:
The protocol template contains the minimum level of security controls that should be in place for all information sharing. Depending on the nature of the information shared, you’ll need to consider what additional security controls may be required and add these into the template.
Requirements:
Restrictions:
|
Your ICT or information security team will help you determine appropriate security controls to ensure the information is protected when it is shared with attending agencies. |
Attending agency and organisation representatives should only retain information shared at a multi-agency meeting if they’re using that information for one of the meeting purposes – for example, undertaking a risk or needs assessment, identifying appropriate support services or interventions.
Where attending agency and organisation representatives retain shared information for those purposes, they must ensure that the information is stored securely in their agency or organisation’s approved business system.
Information should only be held and retained by attending agency and organisation representatives for the period for which the information is required. Attending agencies and organisations should understand their agency or organisation retention and disposal requirements and how they apply to the information being shared with them at the multi-agency meeting.
|
You should also consider where and how multi-agency meeting administration documentation such as meeting agendas, minutes and action logs will be stored. Meeting administration records should be maintained by the lead agency and contain as little identifying information about the child or young person as possible. |
Transparency and notification obligationsIt’s essential not to lose sight of the children and young people behind the information that you are sharing.
Your multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol will already do this in a number of ways, for instance, by:
However, you should also set out the steps you’ll take to make sure that people know about the information sharing. This is because, to the greatest extent possible, people should know who is collecting and using their information, and for what purpose. It’s hard to exercise their other rights without that knowledge. Sometimes, they may also be able to choose whether their information is shared or not or provide their views about the proposed sharing of their information.
Putting transparency controls into your multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol will help attending agencies and organisations be aware of and meet any obligations they may have to advise, notify, or consult children and young people about the sharing of their information. This is also a good place to note any controls that ensure that children and young people (or their representatives) will have an opportunity to have a say before any adverse actions are taken against them.
If there is a good reason not to tell children and young people that their information is being shared, modify the transparency clauses in the protocol template to be clear about what that reason is. Provide the clearest possible information without undermining the interests that you’re protecting. For example, it may still be possible to reflect in an agency or organisation’s privacy statement or transparency statement that the sharing happens, even though details are not given because it could undermine the ability to enforce the law.
Read more information about the notification requirements of IPP3A.
Transparency and notification requirements |
|
Attending agencies and organisations are required to follow the following notification processes: |
|
|
Oranga Tamariki Act (section 66C) |
Prior to sharing any information about a child or young person the attending agency or organisation must, if it’s practicable and appropriate to do so:
In some cases, it may not be practicable or appropriate to consult with the child or young person prior to sharing information at the multi-agency meeting. For example, consulting with the child or young person prior to sharing their information could put the child at risk of further harm. The attending agency or organisation representative disclosing the information must advise the other attending agencies and organisation whether the child or young person was consulted before their information was shared, and if they weren’t, the reasons why. |
It’s important that the attending agencies and organisations know what to do if there is a privacy or security breach. Having this agreed in advance means you don’t have to figure it out when a breach happens, and everyone is under pressure.
When developing your information sharing protocol you should identify:
The protocol template provides standard clauses that cover obligations in relation to privacy and security breaches. Each attending agency and organisation should check with their privacy team to make sure the proposed privacy and security breach management processes aligns with what’s expected in their own agency or organisation.
It is important that any conflict of interest is identified early and managed appropriately by both the lead agency and the attending agency and organisation representative.
Having a process for managing a conflict of interest helps attending agency and organisation representatives identify any conflicts early and know what they need to do to manage that conflict.
The protocol template provides standard clauses that set out how conflicts of interest should be managed in a multi-agency meeting setting.
Things change over time, so it’s important to check periodically that the information sharing protocol is working as expected and is still fit for purpose.
We recommend that each attending agency and organisation nominates a relationship manager to represent their agency or organisation. The relationship manager should be someone different to the person that regularly attends the meetings.
The relationship manager will have oversight of the information sharing protocol. They will check how things are working and will be responsible for addressing any problems that arise. They do not necessarily have to attend the multi-agency meetings, but they do need to have a good understanding of the meetings’ purpose, which agencies and organisations attend, what information is shared, and the legislative framework that permits the sharing.
Relationship managers can also help support their attending agency or organisation representative with any information sharing issues that arise. This could include helping to liaise with the agency or organisation’s privacy or legal teams.
We also recommend that relationship managers check in with their attending representatives on a regular basis to ensure that the protocol is operating as intended. This helps to make sure any issues with the information sharing protocol (such as scope creep) are picked up and fixed early.
Approving information sharing protocolsAttending agencies and organisations will have different approaches to who should approve a multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol.
However, an information sharing protocol should be vetted by a person in a senior role related to privacy, legal or information and data, whether or not they are the person to sign the protocol themselves. This will make sure that there is appropriate knowledge and oversight of the information sharing, and that proper protections are in place so attending agency and organisation representatives can be confident about their sharing activities.
It's important that the person approving the protocol has sufficient professional knowledge or has received specialist advice to be confident that it’s appropriate to approve the protocol. This provides a level of integrity to the protocol and provides other attending agencies and organisations and the public with confidence that information is being shared appropriately.
Ultimately, each attending agency or organisation will need to determine the appropriate level of approval for the information sharing protocol.
Things to think about when approving an information sharing protocol:
Each attending agency and organisation relationship manager should be provided with the finalised signed protocol so they can add the protocol to their information sharing catalogue or register.
If you work in the children’s sector or the family harm sector it is likely that your agency or organisation will have representatives attending many multi-agency meetings in multiple areas or regions.
Having all your information sharing protocol information in one place (for example a centralised information sharing catalogue or register) creates efficiencies and supports good governance of your information sharing activities.
For example, you may need to:
Reviewing your multi-agency meeting information sharing protocols ensures that your information sharing remains fit for purpose. It ensures you’re still only sharing information necessary to achieve the purposes of the meeting.
For example, you may find that additional information held by non-attending agencies is required to achieve the meeting purposes. Or, that different methods are required to share the information more securely. Reviewing the protocol will identify these new requirements and processes and enable the protocol to be amended and updated in a considered way.
The protocol template includes a section for recording an appropriate review period, and which attending agency or organisation is responsible for initiating the review. If the multi-agency meeting has a lead agency, it’s recommended that that agency initiates and manages the review.
There should also be a process for an attending agency or organisation to request a review of the protocol at any time if an issue with the sharing of information has arisen.
A review of the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol should involve the following steps:
Step |
Review Action |
|
1 |
Read through the protocol and identify areas that require updating (e.g. updates to legislation, changes to attending agencies or organisations and their representatives) |
|
2 |
Contact with the other attending agencies and organisations relationship manager to confirm whether:
|
|
3 |
Collate the responses from Step 2 and work with the other attending agencies and organisations to make the necessary amendments to the protocol. |
|
4 |
Sign off the amendments and update the protocol. |
|
5 |
Provide a copy of the signed updated protocol to all attending agencies and organisations. |
|
6 |
Ensure all attending agency and organisation representatives are aware of the changes and understand what those changes mean for them. |
Information for attending agency and organisation representatives Use this checklist to help you prepare and give you confidence around:
To ensure the multi-agency meeting is productive and the right information can be shared with the right people, the right people need to attend.
Think about the following:
You should only share information that is relevant to the purposes of the multi-agency meeting. Before attending a meeting:
|
If you are in any doubt about whether personal information can or should be shared at a multi-agency meeting check with your privacy, information sharing or legal team. |
You should only use information shared at a multi-agency meeting for the purposes set out in the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol.
When attending a meeting:
It is important that you share information with other attending agencies and organisations in a secure manner.
Before sharing information:
|
Before you share information with other attending agency or organisation representatives check your agency’s policies and requirements for emailing personal information to external parties. |
If you attend a multi-agency meeting and information is being requested and shared about a child or young person that you know this may create a conflict of interest for you. If this occurs you should:
|
It’s good practice to check for any potential conflicts of interest before the multi-agency meeting starts. An easy way to do this is by making it a standing meeting agenda item. |
Where your agency or organisation has been tasked with using the information shared at a multi-agency meeting to undertake an action (e.g. complete a risk or needs assessment or provide a support service) you can share with the attending agencies and organisation the outcome of that action.
Where the multi-agency meeting uses a business system to manage the sharing of information and tasking of actions, you can enter the outcome of your tasking activity directly into the business system (e.g. the outcome of a safety risk assessment undertaken by an agency in response to a family harm incident can be entered directly into the Family Safety System).
This section sets out the meaning of key terms used within the guidance.
Agencies and organisations that attend the multi-agency meeting and are signatories to the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol.
Individuals attending the multi-agency meeting on behalf of their agency or organisation.
Includes data, personal information, aggregate information, and de identified information.
Means information about an identifiable individual.
The agency that sets up the multi-agency meeting and is responsible for developing and implementing the multi-agency meeting information sharing protocol.
Digital or digitisable data, information, or knowledge (including matauranga Māori) that is about, from or connected to Māori. It includes data and information about population, place, culture, and environment.
A meeting where different agencies and organisations come together for a common purpose in a meeting setting. These meetings can be one-off events or occur regularly over a period of time.