Case Note 251185 [2015] NZPrivCmr 3: Use of smart meters by utility companies
We received several enquiries from members of the public who were concerned about the privacy implications of smart meters.
Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
We respect your Do Not Track preference.
You can search for case notes either by using the date filter below, or by using the free text search on our website. The free text search box displays in the top right hand corner of your desktop window. For mobile devices, you can access the free text search box from the menu icon (the three horizontal lines) on the top right corner of your device screen.
Displaying 81 - 100 of 370
We received several enquiries from members of the public who were concerned about the privacy implications of smart meters.
A woman complained to a telecommunications company after receiving a notice from a collections agency that a debt had been lodged against her name.
A man was concerned that he had been filmed in the men’s toilets of a pub by a fixed CCTV camera.
A doctor working in a suburban medical practice had his car broken into and bag stolen. The bag contained a USB stick holding patient information.
A man was previously a client of a recruitment agency. One of the agency’s services was to provide an online profile for the man.
A man applied for trauma insurance with an insurance company, authorising the collection of his health information.
We received a complaint from a mother who had requested her child’s health information from a medical clinic which declined to provide the information.
A man was involved in an altercation in a bar which resulted in his removal by Police. He says he was humiliated by photos of him put on the bar noticeboard.
A man requested his medical information from a former healthcare provider which gave the man most of his file but withheld some information.
An ACC claimant had two claims - a sensitive claim and a current physical injury claim. Information about his claims was sent to two agencies by ACC.
A man made complaints about his neighbour to his local council. His complaints were made on the basis that his name would remain confidential.
A woman was being treated for a serious illness at her local hospital. Her doctor dictated a file note about the woman's illness and the proposed treatment.
A woman had received several calls from an unidentified person, which had alarmed her.
A woman told us that she had applied for a job as a part-time retail assistant with a large retail chain employer.
A man made a request to his bank for copies of loan documents that had been completed by his former wife.
A man applied for a job that required him to agree to vetting by Police. The man authorised Police to release information about him to his potential employer.
An ACC claimant asked Dispute Resolution Services Limited to formally review a decision made by ACC.
As part of an employment investigation, an employer collected personal information from a man's work computer.
A woman alleged that work undertaken by her local council had been the cause of damage to her property. She asked for a copy of a geotechnical report.
A debt collection agency had been attempting to contact a woman at her workplace.