Our website uses cookies so we can analyse our site usage and give you the best experience. Click "Accept" if you’re happy with this, or click "More" for information about cookies on our site, how to opt out, and how to disable cookies altogether.
We respect your Do Not Track preference.
These scenarios are examples of how an agency might apply rule 6 in context.
Topics covered: confirmation of type and access to biometric sample
A store uses FRT to identify individuals on a watchlist of previously violent customers to help improve staff and customer safety.
The store receives a request from two individuals for access to their biometric information:
Fingerprint scan for Multi Factor Authentication (MFA) Topics covered: access to biometric template
A business is using a multi factor authentication (MFA) system using employee fingerprints as one authentication factor. An employee makes a request for their biometric information. The employer holds a template of the fingerprint that the system uses to verify the employee’s identity. It is possible to extract the fingerprint template from the system, but it is not something that would be readily understandable (because it looks like a random sequence of numbers).
The employer provides the employee with a copy of the fingerprint template, even though the template is not understandable outside of the context of the system. They also decide to provide a brief written explanation of what the template means and how it is used by the fingerprint recognition system to verify the employee.